Comparison · Managed IT

Co-Managed IT vs Fully Managed IT

Both models give you BASG's monitoring, security operations, compliance support, and senior engineering. The difference is whether BASG augments an existing internal IT team or operates as your IT department.

Who each option is best for

Co-Managed IT fits companies that already have internal IT staff who are competent but stretched, or who lack specific specialization (security engineering, cloud architecture, compliance). The internal team retains day-to-day ownership; BASG fills the gaps.

Fully Managed IT fits companies that have no internal IT team, or whose internal IT is being phased out. BASG operates as the IT department: helpdesk, monitoring, security, compliance, vendor management, and a virtual CIO who owns the roadmap.

Side-by-side comparison

Criterion Co-Managed ITFully Managed IT
Internal IT team required Yes — at least 1 internal IT personNo — BASG operates as your IT department
Day-to-day ownership Internal teamBASG
Strategy / vCIO BASG provides vCIO; internal team executesBASG provides vCIO and execution
Helpdesk Internal team handles tier 1; BASG handles overflow + after-hoursBASG handles all tiers
Security operations BASG (24/7 SOC, EDR, SIEM)BASG (24/7 SOC, EDR, SIEM)
Compliance evidence collection BASGBASG
Best for Companies whose IT team is competent but stretched, or lacks security/compliance/cloud specializationCompanies with no internal IT, or where internal IT is being phased out
Pricing model Monthly retainer scoped to augmentation needsPer user / per endpoint per month
Typical engagement size 1–3 internal IT staff being augmentedFull IT department replacement
Limitations Requires clear role boundaries with internal teamLess internal product / app expertise

Pricing comparison

Co-managed IT is typically priced as a monthly retainer scoped to the augmentation needed — most engagements bundle 24/7 monitoring, EDR, SIEM, after-hours coverage, vCIO time, and a fixed pool of senior-engineer hours.

Fully managed IT is priced per user per month or per endpoint per month, with predictable flat-rate billing. Hardware, licensing, and major projects are scoped separately.

Limitations to know

  • Co-managed requires a clear boundary with internal staff. If roles overlap or the internal team is uncooperative, accountability suffers.
  • Co-managed total cost (BASG + internal salaries + benefits) is often higher than fully managed for mid-market companies — make sure your internal team adds value beyond IT support.
  • Fully managed means your internal team loses day-to-day product expertise. Plan a knowledge-transfer phase if you're transitioning from internal IT.

How to choose

  1. If you have 1+ competent internal IT staff and you do not plan to lose them, start with co-managed.
  2. If you have no internal IT, or are about to lose your only IT person, choose fully managed.
  3. If your internal IT does great line-of-business application work but cannot keep up with security / compliance / cloud, co-managed is the right model.
  4. If your internal IT is overwhelmed by tickets and you want them refocused on strategic work, fully managed often wins on total cost.

Recommendation

For mid-market companies with 1–3 existing IT staff, BASG usually recommends starting co-managed. It preserves institutional knowledge, gets BASG's security and compliance program live quickly, and creates a clear path to fully managed if the internal team rolls off later. Talk to BASG if you want a written recommendation specific to your environment.

Common questions

Ready to figure out which model fits?

BASG will ask you 8 questions about your team, environment, and goals. You'll leave the call knowing which model fits — even if it's not us.